Archive for September, 2010

Saturday, September 25th, 2010

The first casino in the City of Philadelphia is due to open its doors to the general public for the first time today, and New Jersey gaming regulators are eyeing the debut with much wariness. Although gambling has been legalized in Pennsylvania for six years already, the opening of the city’s first casino marks a turning point in the battle fought on the public front.

The Sugarhouse Casino in Philadelphia is not the state’s first casino – it is in fact its 10th. However, its close proximity to Atlantic City (only an hour’s drive) means that officials in the shore town are worried that it will take away much needed business to the casinos.

The New Jersey Casino Control Commission tried to play down the threat and said that the opening of the Sugarhouse Casino will “have more of a cannibalization effect on Pennsylvania’s casinos that it will have on Atlantic City.” However, the Chairwoman for the commission, Linda Kasserkert said that the timing of the opening is of concern. “We’re at a point in our season where business drops off because summer is ending,” she said. “That’s troubling. Our casinos will feel it from that standpoint.”

The new Sugarhouse Casino – which took under a year to build - will boast 1600 slot machines, as well as forty table games, including blackjack, poker, roulette and others. A large percentage of people who gamble in Atlantic City travel from the Philadelphia region, and New Jersey officials fear – off the record – that many of those customers will now stay at home.

The state is set to earn around $1 billion over the first five years of the casino’s operation, and Philadelphia – with a population of over 1.55 million people – will be the biggest city in the state to have access to casino gambling.

Monday, September 20th, 2010

Once again, rumors and speculation are flying in the online poker industry – this time surrounding the mysterious subpoena of former Full Tilt Poker employee, Jason Newitt. There was no information disclosed over the reason why Newitt was summoned by the Feds, although word will eventually break.

For those of don’t remember, Newitt (aka as JDN) at online poker sites, filed a suit against Full Tilt, Tiltware and Pocket Kings, claiming that he had received an unfair dismissal from the site and that his payments were “unfairly ceased”.

The Feds are staying mum on whether his subpoena has anything to do with the lawsuit he has going against Full Tilt Poker or online poker at all. The general feeling in the media is that whatever it is, it is probably not in the best interests of poker.

Over the past few years, the US Department of Justice has been persistent in its efforts to nab online gambling payment processors in a bid to enforce the controversial Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). While the Feds would love to get their hands on online poker operators, these are usually located offshore and out of the DOJ’s jurisdiction. However, payment processors usually open accounts at US banks to pay poker fans their winnings, and become easy targets for Feds.

Steve “Chops” Preiss told Pokernewsdaily.com this week: “In general, subpoenas are not overly specific in nature. It’s no secret the DOJ has been investigating the online poker industry, and when J.D. Newitt sued Full Tilt Poker, he certainly opened himself up for some follow-up from the government. We simply won’t know if the subpoena is specifically targeting Full Tilt Poker or part of a larger and broader investigation of online poker until after the fact.”

Monday, September 20th, 2010

Which members of congress are the best when it comes to supporting the legalization of online poker? The Poker Players Alliance decided to rate members of Congress based on their willingness to fight for the cause that is closest to the hearts of over one million PPA members.

“The poker community has made tremendous progress over the past two years in educating members of Congress on the benefits of regulating online poker,” said former Sen. Alfonse D’Amato, who now serves as chairman of the Poker Players Alliance.

“The grades in our 2010 Congressional Ratings Guide indicate that progress, but also underscore that more needs to be done,” D’Amato said.

Members of Congress from Nevada received particularly good marks for the support of the legalization and regulation of online poker. Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Las Vegas, earned herself top marks with an A+.

Others who received good grades were Rep. Dina Titus (D-Las Vegas) and Rep. Dean Heller (R-Reno), who both scored an A. A lower – but relatively good – B grade was given to Republican Senator John Ensign and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

There was also an overall improvement in the number of members of congress who learned D’s and F’s. In 2008, a dismal 258 members were graded with these scores, while ‘only’ 194 received a D or an F this year.

A total of 91 members of congress received an A this year.

So what made the Nevada team earn such high scoring? For one, all the members of the five-person delegation (except Senator John Ensign) corresponded with letters of support in favor of the rights of online poker players. In addition, a couple co-sponsored legislation that is being backed by the PPA.

The PPA Congressional Ratings Guide can be viewed in its entirety at http://www.congressionalpoker.org/